Posts Tagged ‘EU’


EU 7th Framework projects on aquaculture

September 21st, 2008 by Andrew

It appears that, like the founders of Finfish, the EU has recognised the scale and importance of the challenges and opportunities currently facing aquaculture. In their most recent research funding programme (7th Framework) they have funded several aquaculture innovation projects:

It appears from their selection of these projects that the EU is currently most strongly focussed on improving the environmental and welfare aspects of the aquaculture industry. This reflects the European Commission’s 2002 strategy for developing the aquaculture sector which established the following objectives:

 

  • Creating secure employment particularly in fisheries dependent areas: the target is the creation of 8 000 to 10 000 full-time job equivalents over the period 2003-2008.
  • Providing safe and good quality fisheries products and promoting animal health and welfare standards.
  • Ensuring an environmentally sound industry.

Further information about the European Commission’s aquaculture policy is available at http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/aquaculture_processing/aquaculture_en.htm


Seafood Plus project

September 21st, 2008 by Andrew

The Seafood Plus project is an EU 6th Framework project bringing together over 70 research institutions to work on over 20 research proposals.

It is the largest aquaculture project ever funded by the EU at 26m Euros.

The aim of the project is to make it possible to reduce health problems, to prevent major diseases and to increase well-being among European consumers by using the opportunity to apply the benefits obtained through consumption of health promoting and safe seafood products of high eating quality.

Sea food is widely defined and includes finfish. The project will focus on 6 research areas:

  • Seafood and human nutrition
  • Seafood and consumer behavior and wellbeing
  • Seafood safety
  • Seafood from source to consumer product
  • Seafood from aquaculture
  • Seafood traceability to ensure consumer confidence

A key theme of the project is therefore to increase demand for seafood by bolstering customer confidence through improved traceability – they term it “from fork to farm”.

They have looked into technologies such as RFID. They have also done very interesting work around understanding the market demand for fish, for example highlighting that many people want the benefits of Omega 3 through a tablet rather than a whole fish due to taste and odour considerations, and also that fish needs to be adapted to suit popular modern cooking techniques such as stir frying.

I think this is a particularly valuable area of research as the majority of the research cited on this site appears to be motivated by a push strategy (i.e. being led by the industry) whereas this research represents a pull strategy, i.e. being led by the market.

Summaries of their results so far can be found at http://www.seafoodplus.org/Popular_articles.327.0.html 

Further information about the project can be found at http://www.seafoodplus.org/Home.326.0.html

It is also possible to become an Associate Member of the Seafood Plus project, giving access to their research findings faster and in clear language.

This is mainly designed for aquaculture SMEs and larger businesses but may be something that members of the Finfish community could be interested in? More details are available at http://www.seafoodplus.org/Associates_of_SEAFOODp.395.0.html


Chris Bridges: Tuna and Aquaculture Advancements

July 30th, 2008 by Andrew

Finfish spoke with Professor Chris Bridges, one of the researchers responsible for closing the lifecycle of Atlantic and Southern Bluefin Tuna that has received much prominence and excitement in the global aquaculture community over the past year.

Professor Bridges is Group leader : Ecophysiology / Fish physiology at the Institute for Zoophysiology Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf Germany.

Chris is a fish physiologist who has been looking at the reproductive biology of bluefin tuna for over 10 years. The basics interests of his research group are to look at the adaptations of specific species to environmental factors. 

The group has developed specific assays for reproductive biomarkers in large pelagic species together with an array of ELISA tests for steroid hormones and specific reproductive markers such as vitellogenin and Zona radiata protein.

They are supported by a well funded biological tool room. The tool room experts have designed and constructed many of the devices used for implanting and managing the brood stock. Their work has also included the use of data loggers in monitoring brood stock behaviour and environmental variables within grow out cages.

Here’s a transcript of our conversation.

Welcome to Finfish Chris.

Andrew:  Chris, what was the key step that unlocked the ability for you to achieve the Tuna spawning breakthrough?

Chris:  I think the design and use of the implant system which was further developed in the REPRODOTT project together with the knowledge we obtained as a group of European scientists on the Biology of the Reproduction of Bluefin Tuna were really the basis of the present success of both the REPRODOTT and ALLOTUNA projects.

This experience and technology was also made available to the Clean Seas operation in Port Lincoln Australia where they were the first to obtain fertilised eggs in a land based facility.

The use of GnRHa hormone implants pioneered by the Yoni Zohar and Dinos Mylonas in other fish species has made a major contribution to the sustainability of a number of aquaculture species. 

This was combined with the development of implant tags by our group which could be used underwater without  the need to handle large pelagic species.

These tags ensured that the implant was placed correctly within the muscle tissue, that it was anchored securely and at the same time gave a visual indication of the depth of implantation and the identification of each fish. Further developments are now going on using Titanium provided by Thyssen-Krupp for the implants.

Andrew:  how long ago did you define the problem and begin a concerted effort that led to the solution?

Chris:    This goes back to the initial work started by the European commission funded project DOTT in 2002 which backed onto a previously purely biological  EU project BFTMED  in which we were involved to look at wild tuna populations.

DOTT was conceived to bring together many European researchers to look at the problems involved in the domestication of Tuna.

Following this project the REPRODOTT study then started in 2002 -2005 which involved a whole consortium of European countries with specialists in all fields of reproduction.

The successful conclusion of REPRODOTT with the production of fertilised bluefin tuna eggs in captivity in Mazarron in Spain in July 2005 after hormonal induction was a major breakthrough. 

These results were greeted enthusiastically by the European Commission and our commercial partners Tuna Graso. So much so, in fact,  that in 2007 in an open call for sustainable aquaculture projects in our next project SELFDOTT was recommended for funding by the referees.

At the same time, parallel to this work, the region of Puglia had decided to support the aquaculture industry with structural funds from the European Union and the project ALLOTUNA was conceived under the coordination of the University of Bari.

The breakthrough results of obtaining over 20 million eggs in the tuna farm of Mare Nostro last week in Calabria was due again to an international consortium of European scientists providing their expertise and know-how.  This concerted effort by European scientists supported by the tuna farming industry in Spain, Malta and Italy together with the European commission has made  this success possible.

Andrew:    what is your vision for how you would like to see the knowledge that you have created used?

Chris:  We see the role of our group in the development of new tools and techniques for use in the fisheries and aquaculture industry. This can be done by combining with the industry (such as Tuna Graso) to solve some of the bottleneck problems within tuna aquaculture.  At the same time however the sustainability of the fishery and/or aquaculture are of paramount importance at an ecologically viable cost.

Andrew: are you continuing your research in related areas?  Where next?

Chris: As I said above, new projects SELFDOTT and ALLOTUNA will continue to the next two to three years. 

We plan to extend our suite of analytical tools for studying the reproductive behaviour of tuna.

We are also combining our skills in terms of muscle biopsy sampling from live fish for genetically  fingerprinting and sex determination of brood stock.

We will also shortly be delivering a sex determination system based on Zona radiata protein antibodies to helping in the work of CSIRO in monitoring the Indonesian southern bluefin tuna landings. 

First you can see we have plenty to keep us busy for the future.

Andrew:     To your mind, what is the largest challenge that stands in the way of achieving sustainable aquaculture production on a global basis?

Chris:     Two major challenges are  already present within the aquaculture sector.  The first is the lack of space within the marine environment, especially the coastal environment for fish farming.  One of the most exciting possibilities is a movement to offshore fish farming perhaps in collaboration with the offshore wind farms such as those being proposed by the Blue-H  group

The second challenge of an ecologically viable aquaculture revolves around the use of pelleted artificial feeds and this is  indeed part of the remit of the SELFDOTT and ALLOTUNA projects.

Andrew:      Thank you for sharing your insights with us Chris.  The Finfish community wishes you well with your research endeavours and we look forward to staying in touch with you and your work.

 

 

 


Next Page »